<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Complete and Utter Zebu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog</link>
	<description>Lies, deception, bullshit. It&#039;s everywhere. We&#039;ve had enough. It&#039;s time to fight back!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:54:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Ming the Preposterous by Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/07/ming-the-preposterous/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/07/ming-the-preposterous/#comment-731</guid>
		<description>Ming Dynasty Tombs are the thirteen Tombs of the Ming Empire.This location was cautiously selected as per the Feng Shui principles.It is a valley that has water and other necessities as per Feng Shui.You can see Shengong Shengde Stele Pavilion, huge tortoise shaped dragon-beast of 50 tonfour pillars made up of white marble called Huabiao.For more details refer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.travelasia360.net/a-history-that-was-created-by-the-ming-dynasty-tombs.html/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Ming Dynasty&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ming Dynasty Tombs are the thirteen Tombs of the Ming Empire.This location was cautiously selected as per the Feng Shui principles.It is a valley that has water and other necessities as per Feng Shui.You can see Shengong Shengde Stele Pavilion, huge tortoise shaped dragon-beast of 50 tonfour pillars made up of white marble called Huabiao.For more details refer <a href="http://www.travelasia360.net/a-history-that-was-created-by-the-ming-dynasty-tombs.html/" rel="nofollow">The Ming Dynasty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Memory can be enhanced by a fake drug by Graham King</title>
		<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/26/memory-can-be-enhanced-by-a-fake-drug/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/26/memory-can-be-enhanced-by-a-fake-drug/#comment-586</guid>
		<description>The original thesis is here: http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/1036?show=full</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original thesis is here: <a href="http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/1036?show=full" rel="nofollow">http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/1036?show=full</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Train punctuality figures fiddled by No vote without a National Insurance number &#124; Complete and Utter Zebu</title>
		<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/19/train-punctuality-figures-fiddled/comment-page-1/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>No vote without a National Insurance number &#124; Complete and Utter Zebu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/19/train-punctuality-figures-fiddled/#comment-509</guid>
		<description>[...] OTHER POSTSMPs get Statistics for Dummies bookHow your train is official &#8220;on time&#8221; even when it is late [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OTHER POSTSMPs get Statistics for Dummies bookHow your train is official &#8220;on time&#8221; even when it is late [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MPs get &#8220;Statistics for Dummies&#8221; by URS</title>
		<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/18/mps-get-statistics-for-dummies/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>URS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/18/mps-get-statistics-for-dummies/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Statistics is a science. There are lots of ways of calculating averages. In the famous dispute over pay in a government department, for some quite-impossible-to-discern reason the ONS used a method that minimised the gender pay gap, and Harriet Harman used one that showed it more clearly. Of course you can&#039;t expect the ONS to recognise that their method is unsuited to a situation that is distorted by outliers -- or could you expect professional statisticians to manage that?  

Did making the ONS more independent make them more honest, or more dependent on producing the figures the great leader demands?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Statistics is a science. There are lots of ways of calculating averages. In the famous dispute over pay in a government department, for some quite-impossible-to-discern reason the ONS used a method that minimised the gender pay gap, and Harriet Harman used one that showed it more clearly. Of course you can&#8217;t expect the ONS to recognise that their method is unsuited to a situation that is distorted by outliers &#8212; or could you expect professional statisticians to manage that?  </p>
<p>Did making the ONS more independent make them more honest, or more dependent on producing the figures the great leader demands?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Statistics not worth the paper they&#8217;re printed on by MPs get &#8220;Statistics for Dummies&#8221; &#124; Complete and Utter Zebu</title>
		<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2009/11/27/statistics-not-worth-the-paper-theyre-printed-on/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>MPs get &#8220;Statistics for Dummies&#8221; &#124; Complete and Utter Zebu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2009/11/27/statistics-not-worth-the-paper-theyre-printed-on/#comment-469</guid>
		<description>[...] POSTSIs Harriet Harman a liar? Or just stupid?Statistics not worth the paper they&#8217;re printed onGordon Brown and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] POSTSIs Harriet Harman a liar? Or just stupid?Statistics not worth the paper they&#8217;re printed onGordon Brown and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Harriet Harman a liar? Or just stupid? by MPs get &#8220;Statistics for Dummies&#8221; &#124; Complete and Utter Zebu</title>
		<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2009/11/06/is-harriet-harman-a-liar-or-just-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>MPs get &#8220;Statistics for Dummies&#8221; &#124; Complete and Utter Zebu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2009/11/06/is-harriet-harman-a-liar-or-just-stupid/#comment-468</guid>
		<description>[...] POSTSIs Harriet Harman a liar? Or just stupid?Statistics not worth the paper they&#8217;re printed onGordon Brown and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] POSTSIs Harriet Harman a liar? Or just stupid?Statistics not worth the paper they&#8217;re printed onGordon Brown and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Image Too Far by In Moscow, Big Brother is NOT watching you &#124; Complete and Utter Zebu</title>
		<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2009/12/19/an-image-too-far/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>In Moscow, Big Brother is NOT watching you &#124; Complete and Utter Zebu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2009/12/19/an-image-too-far/#comment-417</guid>
		<description>[...] The most scandalous CCTV image ever?How many CCTV cameras in Britain? They have no idea.Council CCTV cameras triple in decade [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The most scandalous CCTV image ever?How many CCTV cameras in Britain? They have no idea.Council CCTV cameras triple in decade [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Going google-eyed by Google blots its copybook again &#124; Complete and Utter Zebu</title>
		<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2009/11/25/going-google-eyed/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Google blots its copybook again &#124; Complete and Utter Zebu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2009/11/25/going-google-eyed/#comment-412</guid>
		<description>[...] RELATED POSTGoogle&#8217;s disgraceful Chinese censorship in picture form [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RELATED POSTGoogle&#8217;s disgraceful Chinese censorship in picture form [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zebu review of the year – part 2 by Chris Gilmore</title>
		<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/03/zebu-review-of-the-year-%e2%80%93-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Gilmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/03/zebu-review-of-the-year-%e2%80%93-part-2/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to add the following to your discussion of Harriet Harman who is (in my opinion) a crazed control-freak.
 
Quote:
In a show of sisterly concern, her Tory shadow, Theresa May, weighed in to deplore university research &quot;which downplayed the extent of trafficking&quot; for prostitution and was cited in Nick Davies&#039;s Guardian report along the same lines. Not only did Harman agree, (citing a dreadful case in passing), she revved up. &quot;I take this opportunity to deplore the reporting in the Guardian ... those involved should be ashamed of themselves.&quot;
Unbelievable - so she condemns the research, not for the methods used, but purely because they came up with results that did not fit her view?
 
Passing to my own comments, Zebu is a great word, as you say, but I think you overplay your hand when you complain that people describe its flesh as beef. Hillaire Belloc, in his Moral Alphabet, began his Z entry with:
 
This Zebu, which like all Zebus
I sacred to devout Hindoos ...
 
Clearly, Hindus regard Zebu as a breed of cattle, and quite rightly so, since you mention yourselves that they can be crossed with other such breeds. OK; some crosses between closely related but separate species &#039;mule out&#039;. All (or almost all) individuals are infertile, with each other and both parent species. Now it may be that in S America and elsewhere the owners of the herds arrange a mating whenever they want a calf, but I hae&#039; me doots. I suspect that they have large herds of the crosses, which they breed according to the usual principles of animal husbandry.
    Although Zebu look distinctly odd if you&#039;re only used to UK cattle (I remember my first sighting of them in Malaysia), that is only a question of familiarity. They are, I suspect, a race, or sub-species, of kine. For that matter, wolves, dogs, jackals and coyotes are all one species, and will interbreed naturally. Did I mention dogs? Suppose you were a Monster from Outer Space and, having been courteously received by us humans, were presented with a Great Dane, a St Bernard, a Pekinese and a Chihuaha. You might possibly guess that the first two were different breeds of the same species, but I think most likely not as regards the latter. As for all four being fully interfertile - No way! Yet it would be no great trick to inseminate artificially either of the first two with either of the second. Exactly what you&#039;d get, and how many, I&#039;ve no idea - most likely a lot, but they&#039;d all be dogs. The other way round would be messier, as you&#039;d have to use IVF and a surrogate - but I suspect those that made it would look very like the first litters, and breed with them by normal means. You&#039;d surely get some problems with whelping, through throwback puppies, but veterinerary caesarian section ain&#039;t exactly rocket science. (Nor is selective breeding, though it requires rather more finesse.)
    Of course, describing imported Zebu or cross-Zebu meat as British must be wrong, but had the cattle been born and reared in the country, I&#039;d have no objection. After all, suppose you were to visit a London restaurant and there consume a superb, guaranteed British, sirloin steak; would you complain if the waiter couldn&#039;t say for sure if it was Hereford or Holstein?
    Even more relevant, would you (other things, such as freedom from disease and pollutants being equal) rather eat your favourite cut from a young Zebu(cross) steer that had been bred and nurtured for the table, in whatever country, or a 25-year-old Jersey milch-cow who had been slaughtered because the last attempt to breed from her had failed?
    Coming closer to home, I happen to work at a site which employs a stupendous mix of races. Among my colleagues are a huge black man (nearer seven feet than six, and heavy with it) and an even taller but somewhat slighter Pole. There&#039;s also a small-boned Fillipino who barely tops five feet. I regard all three as men, and surprisingly enough, such is their opinion of me (not a big claim).
 
My other bone of contention with you lies with your reference to the &#039;promise to pay&#039; on UK banknotes. When I was still in short trousers (which is to say, well before either of you gentlemen were born, and the name on the notes was L K O&#039;Brien), I asked my father exactly what that meant. This was a pound, so what was the point of promising to pay a pound for it? He explained to me how the word &#039;pound&#039; in this context meant originally a pound of English silver pennies, there being in those days 12 pennies to the ounce, 12 ounces to the pound (rather than sixteen), also twenty shillings to the pound. So what did it mean? I forget his exact answer, but not too long afterwards I substituted my own - an empty form of words, rather like the grandiloquent expressions on my passport, or the promise to &#039;love&#039; in the CofE marriage service.
    Aho! This is not the point to commence a discussion of the topic of &#039;fiat money&#039;. Other things aside, I&#039;ve had a long, hard day and I&#039;m dead drunk. (Had I been sober, this e-mail would have been shorter, less verbose,and more cogent. It would also have been more grammatical, and contained fewer typos and spelling mistakes.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to add the following to your discussion of Harriet Harman who is (in my opinion) a crazed control-freak.</p>
<p>Quote:<br />
In a show of sisterly concern, her Tory shadow, Theresa May, weighed in to deplore university research &#8220;which downplayed the extent of trafficking&#8221; for prostitution and was cited in Nick Davies&#8217;s Guardian report along the same lines. Not only did Harman agree, (citing a dreadful case in passing), she revved up. &#8220;I take this opportunity to deplore the reporting in the Guardian &#8230; those involved should be ashamed of themselves.&#8221;<br />
Unbelievable &#8211; so she condemns the research, not for the methods used, but purely because they came up with results that did not fit her view?</p>
<p>Passing to my own comments, Zebu is a great word, as you say, but I think you overplay your hand when you complain that people describe its flesh as beef. Hillaire Belloc, in his Moral Alphabet, began his Z entry with:</p>
<p>This Zebu, which like all Zebus<br />
I sacred to devout Hindoos &#8230;</p>
<p>Clearly, Hindus regard Zebu as a breed of cattle, and quite rightly so, since you mention yourselves that they can be crossed with other such breeds. OK; some crosses between closely related but separate species &#8216;mule out&#8217;. All (or almost all) individuals are infertile, with each other and both parent species. Now it may be that in S America and elsewhere the owners of the herds arrange a mating whenever they want a calf, but I hae&#8217; me doots. I suspect that they have large herds of the crosses, which they breed according to the usual principles of animal husbandry.<br />
    Although Zebu look distinctly odd if you&#8217;re only used to UK cattle (I remember my first sighting of them in Malaysia), that is only a question of familiarity. They are, I suspect, a race, or sub-species, of kine. For that matter, wolves, dogs, jackals and coyotes are all one species, and will interbreed naturally. Did I mention dogs? Suppose you were a Monster from Outer Space and, having been courteously received by us humans, were presented with a Great Dane, a St Bernard, a Pekinese and a Chihuaha. You might possibly guess that the first two were different breeds of the same species, but I think most likely not as regards the latter. As for all four being fully interfertile &#8211; No way! Yet it would be no great trick to inseminate artificially either of the first two with either of the second. Exactly what you&#8217;d get, and how many, I&#8217;ve no idea &#8211; most likely a lot, but they&#8217;d all be dogs. The other way round would be messier, as you&#8217;d have to use IVF and a surrogate &#8211; but I suspect those that made it would look very like the first litters, and breed with them by normal means. You&#8217;d surely get some problems with whelping, through throwback puppies, but veterinerary caesarian section ain&#8217;t exactly rocket science. (Nor is selective breeding, though it requires rather more finesse.)<br />
    Of course, describing imported Zebu or cross-Zebu meat as British must be wrong, but had the cattle been born and reared in the country, I&#8217;d have no objection. After all, suppose you were to visit a London restaurant and there consume a superb, guaranteed British, sirloin steak; would you complain if the waiter couldn&#8217;t say for sure if it was Hereford or Holstein?<br />
    Even more relevant, would you (other things, such as freedom from disease and pollutants being equal) rather eat your favourite cut from a young Zebu(cross) steer that had been bred and nurtured for the table, in whatever country, or a 25-year-old Jersey milch-cow who had been slaughtered because the last attempt to breed from her had failed?<br />
    Coming closer to home, I happen to work at a site which employs a stupendous mix of races. Among my colleagues are a huge black man (nearer seven feet than six, and heavy with it) and an even taller but somewhat slighter Pole. There&#8217;s also a small-boned Fillipino who barely tops five feet. I regard all three as men, and surprisingly enough, such is their opinion of me (not a big claim).</p>
<p>My other bone of contention with you lies with your reference to the &#8216;promise to pay&#8217; on UK banknotes. When I was still in short trousers (which is to say, well before either of you gentlemen were born, and the name on the notes was L K O&#8217;Brien), I asked my father exactly what that meant. This was a pound, so what was the point of promising to pay a pound for it? He explained to me how the word &#8216;pound&#8217; in this context meant originally a pound of English silver pennies, there being in those days 12 pennies to the ounce, 12 ounces to the pound (rather than sixteen), also twenty shillings to the pound. So what did it mean? I forget his exact answer, but not too long afterwards I substituted my own &#8211; an empty form of words, rather like the grandiloquent expressions on my passport, or the promise to &#8216;love&#8217; in the CofE marriage service.<br />
    Aho! This is not the point to commence a discussion of the topic of &#8216;fiat money&#8217;. Other things aside, I&#8217;ve had a long, hard day and I&#8217;m dead drunk. (Had I been sober, this e-mail would have been shorter, less verbose,and more cogent. It would also have been more grammatical, and contained fewer typos and spelling mistakes.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just because it&#8217;s pricey does not mean it&#8217;s what it says on the tin by Dagny Taggart</title>
		<link>http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/06/just-because-its-pricey-does-not-mean-the-label-tells-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagny Taggart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utterzebu.com/blog/2010/01/06/just-because-its-pricey-does-not-mean-the-label-tells-the-truth/#comment-371</guid>
		<description>Why am I not surprised? Well, actually I AM rather surprised, but it&#039;s just sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why am I not surprised? Well, actually I AM rather surprised, but it&#8217;s just sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
